Reading the various forums and articles on the net it is quite obvious there must have been a design flaw in the oil pressure based timing chain tensioner used in the v6 vitara.
It seems that this fault not only effects the 2.0l v6 but also the 2.5l version.
What really intrigues me is that it seems that SUZUKI refuse to be fixing the problem. After recently purchasing a new tensioner for another replacement the sales reps comments were "as soon as we receive these tensioners they are straight out the door". I asked whether this problem still occurs with current models, the response being "yes". When asked whether the replacement parts are any better than the original components, the response was "no". When asked whether I could expect to get 50,000km out of a new tensioner, the response was "hopefully".
Now for such a fundamental problem effecting a large number of vehicles I was really expecting the rep to say "here is a new improved tensioner which will last a lot longer than the original". I suppose it is a good little money earner for suzuki agents with a relatively cheap component requiring replacement after a fairly large amount of labour required.
So, either poor performance Suzuki, or just a clever scan??? I don't know.....
It seems that this fault not only effects the 2.0l v6 but also the 2.5l version.
What really intrigues me is that it seems that SUZUKI refuse to be fixing the problem. After recently purchasing a new tensioner for another replacement the sales reps comments were "as soon as we receive these tensioners they are straight out the door". I asked whether this problem still occurs with current models, the response being "yes". When asked whether the replacement parts are any better than the original components, the response was "no". When asked whether I could expect to get 50,000km out of a new tensioner, the response was "hopefully".
Now for such a fundamental problem effecting a large number of vehicles I was really expecting the rep to say "here is a new improved tensioner which will last a lot longer than the original". I suppose it is a good little money earner for suzuki agents with a relatively cheap component requiring replacement after a fairly large amount of labour required.
So, either poor performance Suzuki, or just a clever scan??? I don't know.....